Yesterday, Canadians were informed of the sexy allure of cancer and radioactive leaks, something I guess we must have all missed. And today, we were informed that being rightly outraged about this fiasco surrounding Lisa Raitt, and pointing it out in the House of Commons, is cheap politics.
Harper clearly is grasping at straws. Pointing out such an obvious flaw in the government's handling of issues certainly does not constitute cheap politics. As Michael Ignatieff pointed out, the fact that Lisa Raitt saw this as a career advancement opportunity is a much greater instance of cheap politics. She is hoping for sexy problems for her to solve. What is cheaper?
Recommend this Post at Progressive Bloggers
If you liked this post, please vote for my blog at Canadian Blogosphere
Tuesday, June 9, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(141)
-
▼
June
(21)
- Ignatieff, there are many other people in it with ...
- Further Desperation Strikes in Iran: Revealing ele...
- Bring Mohammed Kohail home
- Historic US bill on climate change good, but nowhe...
- Fraud according to Iran's Guardian Council
- Canadians don't like elections: force them to have...
- If only North America were like Iran
- Why we should be paying more taxes
- A great opportunity slips through Michael's fingers
- Partisan government advertising: A beloved Conserv...
- They said Harper was smart... Looks like he thinks...
- In a break from election speculation, attempts at ...
- Will the Bloc Quebecois regret opposing the Conser...
- To pull or not to pull the plug, that is the question
- Conservatives intentionally confusing themselves?
- A list of Conservative "cheap politics"
- Cheap politics is career advancements
- The "sexy" minister has to go
- A response to Rex Murphy
- We are governed by a 26 year old, and it's not Jas...
- Let's get a steadier hand at the tiller
-
▼
June
(21)
Hypocrisy, plain and simple!
ReplyDelete