Friday, September 11, 2009
Today Ignatieff unequivocally ruled out the substance of the ubiquitous Conservative attack that if they do not obtain a majority, the Liberals will form a coalition government. This was the right move. It has negated as much as possible the Conservatives' most potent fear-mongering strategy for this election.
We saw in the surreptitiously recorded video of the Prime Minister practicing his stump speech that this would be the greatest Conservative attack. We saw to what extent Harper is willing to believe in a coalition. He says that the opposition parties will deny this until they are blue in the face, and subsequently form one anyway. We have seen instead that Stephen Harper will yell himself blue in the face about a coalition until he is blue in the face.
If the polls last December are any good indication, this was promising line of attack. Significant sections of the country were outraged at the possibility of a coalition, deeming it an unseemly power grab. However, now that Ignatieff has strongly denied it, this attack is much less potent.
Especially as Ignatieff can point, and did point, to his refusal of the coalition deal when he assumed the leadership of the LPC. No matter what the Conservatives throw at him, it is a strong piece of evidence.
So far what the Conservatives have mustered against this refusal is a quote from Ignatieff last December: "prepared to form a coalition government and to lead that government." At the time, Ignatieff could not have said anything different, lest he be seen, as deputy leader no less, as opposing his leader.
His actions after he became leader surely speak volumes more, as he at that point had actual control over the party's policy on this issue. What's more, as he reminded Canadians, successful minority governments have operated at the federal level without a coalition. In fact, a less successful government led by Stephen Harper has survived almost four years without entering into a coalition.
Ignatieff's stark denunciation of a coalition was necessary, albeit damaging to the public's perception of a perfectly valid notion. However, what Ignatieff did was necessary. Without it, he would have been highly vulnerable to Harper's baseless attacks. And we all know what happens when you are vulnerable to Harper's baseless attacks. You lose the election. Recommend this Post at Progressive Bloggers If you liked this post, please vote for my blog at Canadian Blogosphere
- Quebec, harbinger of a future lost election?
- Who Wants an Election, Really?
- Liberal Website Needs to Mobilise Supporters More
- Ignatieff Points out Key Difference (s) Between hi...
- Harper Intent on Government ads Promoting him, Rat...
- Mulroney Anniversary Reminds us of the Need for a ...
- We've Avoided an Election, For the Next Week or So...
- The Liberals are Giving Foreign Policy its Due
- We Deserve Better (and We Can Do Better)
- Ignatieff Rules out Coalition in Smart Move
- Think of It as an Electoral Stimulus Package
- Harper Utters "M" Word
- Bloc Advertising Makes Election Inevitable
- The Coalition Bogeyman
- Transcript of French Language Liberal ads Released...
- French Ads Should be Model for Future English Ads
- What Ignatieff's Campaign Narrative Should Be
- Jack, is that a coalition you've formed with Steph...
- ▼ September (18)