The Supreme Court of Canada voted today by a 4-3 margin that Hutterites, a sect who believe that being photographed willingly is sinful, are obliged to have a picture on their driving licenses. And it was the right decision. To do otherwise would have gone against the Charter.
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms has been abused in significant ways in the past. Remember Mark Steyn's article on Islam, and the incensed complaints to the Human Rights Commissions over an infringement of the Charter? That was ridiculous, and an outcome favouring the Hutterite position today would have been a worthy equal.
If photographic identification is not provided on these licenses we may as well not bother with them. Let the four year olds drive! Okay, that's not what the Hutterites were asking for, but abuse of the system would be simple without photo ID. How can the police enforce the system if they don't have this crucial information? It's impossible.
That is any other ruling would have been inadmissible. In the Charter, the Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms states that it "guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society."
In other words, any rights or freedoms can be limited by reasonable demands of the law if they are justified, and photo ID is clearly such a limit. Were the judges to vote in favour of the Hutterites, they would have been disregarding the Charter, and that was the basis of the Hutterites plea!
If only people would read that first clause of the Charter...
Recommend this Post at Progressive Bloggers
If you liked this post, please vote for my blog at Canadian Blogosphere
- Greens and the NDP co-operating? NDP desperate
- Compromises and why evangelicals should give their...
- Abuse of Charter prevented
- Obama's opponents on Health Care Reform
- Ignatieff's "knowledge society" would be a "leap f...
- Harper creating ads attacking his own party
- EKOS poll reveals 2% Conservative advantage
- The Green Party don't do themselves a whole lot of...
- And Stephen Harper's an economist? Make that liber...
- Tory attack ads are "moderate" (Flanagan)
- The Proper Response to the Conference Board
- What happened to no deficit?
- Forgive me if I don't believe Harper and co
- The three ills of Corporate Canada
- Harper must be wondering why he instituted the par...
- CRTC supports local channels, how about the CBC?
- Whoever disapproves of Harper's legislation is a p...
- ▼ July (17)