On the CBC Radio program The House, Tony Clement stated today that there would be no further census concessions. The reason it seems is that Clement believes that he "[is] meeting the objections of those who are concerned about robust and reliable data." I guess he thinks that a 50% response rate is robust and reliable.
The sad fact though is that it isn't. It is fair to say that experts at Statscan, who have made it their life's work to deal with statistics, would know more about what constitutes robust and reliable data than he does, and that therefore we should follow their advice of maintaining the status quo. That is if you're not talking to the experts Clement alleges exist at Statscan that believe that a voluntary long form is a perfectly acceptable substitute for the mandatory long form
Recommend this Post at Progressive Bloggers
If you liked this post, please vote for my blog at Canadian Blogosphere
- Why we Might not Need F-35s
- Has Candice Hoeppner Even Read the RCMP on the Lon...
- Jack Layton Should Whip his MPs on Long-Gun Regist...
- Liberal Census Bill Shows Fundamental Difference B...
- Conservatives Making Shameful Use of Shock Politic...
- What Tories are Missing in the Patronage Revelatio...
- Harper's Conservatives = Soft on Crime
- Conservative Party Workers Fraudulently Posing as ...
- Cheliak bilingual a year ago, but not any longer?
- Let's Make the Census Crisis as Big as Prorogation...
- Clement's version of robust and reliable data
- Tony Clement shows very worrying incompetence
- ▼ August (12)