After criticising Michael Ignatieff yesterday, I thought I'd complement him today. No new policy yet, but at least he showed some evidence of rhetorical ability when he asked Peter Mackay why prisoner transfers between Canadian Forces and Afghanistan have been halted three times. This was Mackay's answer:
“Mr. Speaker, I thank the Leader of the Opposition for the question,” he said. “As he would know, and as he has indicated, decisions to stop transfers are operational decisions taken on a case-by-case basis in a theatre of operations by military personnel. In this instance, and it is now on the government web site, there were three operational decisions taken that resulted in pauses of transfers. Most recently, I want to indicate, the reason that the transfers stopped was because the Afghan officials were not living up to their expectations, not living up to the expectations set out in the transfer arrangements. The decision to stop was based on the fact that they were not living up to those expectations.”
To which Mr Ignatieff responded, rightfully: “Mr. Speaker in other words it is reasonable to assume that detainees were being abused.”
Further evidence we need an inquiry.
Recommend this Post at Progressive Bloggers
If you liked this post, please vote for my blog at Canadian Blogosphere
- A Binding Deal in Copenhagen?
- Finally, Some Policy, and it's Great Policy
- Make all the evidence available
- In Which Ignatieff Shows Rhetorical Skill.
- Please Sir, May we Have Some Policy?
- Denying Responsibility of Torture
- Let's Have a Public Inquiry
- Prentice: The Environment will wait for us
- Who Cares if Others Sign Copenhagen or Not!
- The Climate Won't Wait Until 2050
- Canada's Forces More Important than the Charter?
- Against an Elected Senate (my article for the scho...
- Public to Blame for Health Minister's Failures?
- ▼ November (13)